JOHANNESBURG ( – South Africa’s rising coal mining modifications are poised to current new electrical energy worth threat because the Treasury and Eskom are known as upon to think about the softening of uneconomic contractual coal-supply obligations.

An instance of that is Treasury being requested to authorise Eskom paying extra to Seriti Sources for coal than the contractual association with South32 stipulates.

Until Treasury permits Eskom to launch South32 from its R280/t coal contract at Duvha energy station and agrees to pay Seriti Sources R550/t, Seriti is not going to go forward with the transaction.

South32 and Seriti need the period of the contract minimize to 4 years at R550/t, with Seriti agreeing that Eskom could invite public tenders thereafter, whereas the South32 contract with Eskom has the potential to increase to 2034.

If Treasury approves, the 10 000 000 t of coal a 12 months shall be bought at R550/t, as an alternative of R280/t, which quantities to Eskom having to pay a further R2.7-billion a 12 months for coal for Duvha. Over 4 years, this could be R10.8-billion greater than what’s laid down within the contract signed by South32, which can also be the long-standing beneficiary of very beneficial electrical energy tariffs from Eskom at its Hillside Aluminium operation. Taken over the 14-year interval, the extra quantity would whole R39.8-billion.

On the necessity for a better coal worth, Seriti CEO Mike Teke stated throughout a MS Groups interview with Mining Weekly: “It’s a query of how can we maintain this enterprise.” South32’s coal enterprise, South African Vitality Coal (SAEC), employs about 4 500 personal workers and three 500 to 4 000 contractors.

South32 COO Mike Fraser revealed to Mining Weekly in an MS Groups interview that the ASX-and JSE-listed South32 is negotiating a brand new contract for the cost of electrical energy it receives at Hillside Aluminium from Eskom, and that Nersa approval for the improved stage of cost is awaited.

“In the identical manner that we’ve now moved on a pricing association at Hillside Aluminium, the coal enterprise, with none motion from Eskom and ourselves, wouldn’t present an answer, and you’ll discover this enterprise in all probability failing, as a result of there isn’t any various resolution to closing the Seriti transaction, other than potential closure of SAEC, and that might be devastating, not just for Eskom by way of coal provide, but additionally for the entire contractors and workers who rely on it,” stated Fraser.

“The value that we’re asking for the Duvha contract could be very a lot aligned with what Eskom is paying for coal available in the market, so we consider that it is rather aligned to the market and must be cheap to make sure the sustainability of that enterprise.

“With no resolution for Duvha, the complete enterprise is impacted. You couldn’t simply shut one a part of the enterprise with out it impacting the complete enterprise,” stated Fraser, who added that the corporate would even be offering $200-million value of rehabilitation expenditure, $200-million of financial institution ensures to help amenities to Seriti, and $50-million value of restructuring and dealing capital help.

Seriti can also be concerned in larger image negotiations with Eskom: “We’re working with Eskom by way of a bundle deal to supply them one thing past what is expounded to Duvha solely,” stated Teke.

Relating to the South32 transaction and what the corporate was paying for SAEC, Teke stated: “We’re not paying for these belongings. They’re paying us to take these belongings. The dedication they’re making to Eskom by way of renegotiating their contract is the dialogue that has been taking place between the 2 of them.”

African Supply Markets CEO Bevan Jones stated in response to Mining Weekly: “I perceive that Duvha burns round a 22.50 – 23.00 GJ/mt calorific worth coal. If we have a look at present spot market pricing for this kind of materials, based mostly purely on export costs, a present worth vary can be round R550 to R600 per ton, free on truck or rail, within the Witbank space.

“Nonetheless, present export SA coal costs are at an all-time excessive in rand phrases. I very a lot doubt that this case will final though, in fact, the market has a manner of proving everybody mistaken. Thus, I’d warning any purchaser of coming into right into a time period settlement longer than a 12 months or two, as a result of it’s greater than seemingly that coal costs will subside as soon as extra over the following couple of years.

“This view is predicated purely on a stand-alone coal contract. I’m a market purist and consider contracts must be negotiated on their very own deserves, not relating them to different premiums or reductions obtained elsewhere,” Jones acknowledged in his emailed response.

The opinion of XMP Consulting senior coal analyst Xavier Prévost is that if Eskom pays South32 R280/t contractually, that worth is manner off present Eskom costs for the standard of coal concerned.

“When you see the Eskom month-to-month coal costs launched lately, the newest worth (common) is near R500/t (in December 2020), and better now in all probability,” stated Prévost.

“I consider, whatever the sale of South32 to Seriti, that as Eskom’s CEO says, the South32 provide to Duvha is important for the facility station, in high quality, tonnage and reliability of provide. I’d help the value enhance,” Prévost reiterated.

Eskom spokesperson Sikonathi Mantshantsha stated in response to questions posed by Mining Weekly concerning the explanation why Eskom isn’t holding South32 to its long-term coal provide obligations, or not, in flip, asking to be relieved of the low-prices it’s contracted to make sure at Hillside Aluminium, that Mining Weekly’s questions wouldn’t be answered as a result of they handled confidential inner data and processes concerning transactions that had not but been concluded. 

“Public dialogue of those ongoing negotiations concerning proposed transactions isn’t in the perfect pursuits of Eskom. Prematurely making these particulars of ongoing negotiations public can solely be designed to irregularly affect and undermine essential operational processes. Till finalisation of the due processes, Eskom is not going to be commenting on this matter,” Mantshantsha added.

The Nationwide Treasury media crew’s emailed response concerning its cause for not implementing long-term coal provide contracts of this nature was that clauses for dispute decision, in addition to treatments for non-performance, can be included within the contract between Eskom and the service supplier. “Due to this fact Eskom would observe dispute decision processes in accordance with these clauses, and should embody appointment of an unbiased arbiter. If that course of fails then the matter could be referred to courtroom. Nationwide Treasury could help/facilitate an amicable decision to a dispute. Nonetheless, a call to implement or cancel a contract stays with the Accounting Officer considering all related elements,” the media crew acknowledged in an emailed response.

If the Seriti transaction with South32 goes forward, main Eskom coal suppliers will proceed to incorporate the JSE-listed Exxaro, which has already entered the renewable power area in parallel with curtailed however nonetheless sturdy coal mining actions; the LSE- and JSE-listed Glencore, which has capped its coal provide and introduced that it’s going to deplete its current coal belongings fairly than create uncertainty by disposing of them to others; in addition to corporations such because the JSE-listed Wescoal and the unlisted Menar, which has R7-billion value of coal enlargement plans that embody low-cost coal affords to Eskom.

Additionally on the playing cards is the demerging of Thungela Sources from Anglo American, which can come up for approval on Could 5,

Each Anglo American and South32 are exiting thermal coal to satisfy essential decarbonisation targets demanded by their shareholders as a part of a climate-change mitigation course of.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here